The Command Post
2004 US Presidential Election
January 20, 2004
| Simulblog: The Democratic Response

My simulblog of Daschle’s and Pelosi’s response:

  • The State of our Union is indeed strong
  • The State of the Union address should offer a vision to America
  • We draw inspiration from our soldiers abroad
  • Dems have an unwavering comittement to our national security and our armed forces
  • Even the most powerful nation on earth must “bring other nations to our side”
  • Prez has pursued a “go it alone” policy, stealing resources we need for education and healthcare here at home
  • Prez led us into Iraq on the basis of unproven assertions … “he embraced a radical doctrine of preemptive war unprecedented in our history.”
  • Amercian taxpayers are bearing all the cost and our troops are bearing all the casualties.
  • “America must be a light to the world, not just a missle.”
  • (Pelosi invokes JFK)
  • Pelosi describes Haliburton as a “politically connected firm” enjoying “no bid contracts”
  • We know what we need to do to protect America, “but this administration is failing to meet the challenge”
  • We need to inspect all containers coming into the US, and all nuke plants must have higher security, first-repsonders need real-time communication, we must secure “100%” of enriched uranium and other material for WMD (does she mean globally?)
  • We can do better and should require a higher standard

Now for Tom Daschle:

  • State of Union is strong … but can be stronger still
  • We are losing jobs, and need to correct more
  • Millions of children are being denied what they were promised re: education, and tuitions at public colleges have increased nearly $600 since Bush took office.
  • Dramatically fewer Americans have healthcare, and they are paying higher premiums … “an invisible tax increase” on many Amercians
  • Tax cuts will weaken health coverage
  • “In our vision of an opportunity society, promises made to those who have worked a lifetime will be honored in retirement” … so Soc. Sec should be a “gaurantee, not a gamble.”

Hope this was of use … and pardon the typos.



Posted by Alan at January 20, 2004 10:19 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Ha ha ha ha roflmao! Good Stuff:-) I was unable to see the Democratic Response so I’m glad it is up here.

Boy… What a sorry bunch of liars.

Posted by: Jeff MacMillan at January 21, 2004 12:17 AM

Yes Jeff and your mans claim that we can cut the deficit in half over 5 years by spending more and cutting jack is the model of truth…..

The speech today was poop. Even the republicans think so. Coming after the MLK holiday the juxtaposition of his phrases with this and the Dean poop has me depressed.

If only the great orator was no longer an endangered species….

Posted by: what2 at January 21, 2004 01:07 AM

I could only watch the democratic response briefly…
First off Nancy Pelosi- has she had a stroke and a face lift? and her speach pattern- can…I…speak…more…clearly…and…slowly…
And tom Daschle- I dont like the way he talks or the sound of his voice.. I just couldnt watch it…
Thats not to say anything bad about the substance of what they said, its just, jeez I just couldnt watch it.

Posted by: AnyoneButBush2004 at January 21, 2004 03:47 AM

Kinda fascinating: Bush has become an accomplished speaker, while Pelosi has trouble just reading from the cards.

Daschle and Pelosi reminded me of a cheap infomercial; Lots of lies pushing a lousy product, all hoping the public wouldn’t realize that even THEY didn’t believe the story they were telling…

Tough being a Democrat these days. There are a lot of good issues out there, but the high ground on each of them belongs to the GOP…

Posted by: GDubya at January 21, 2004 01:35 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)