The Command Post
2004 US Presidential Election
January 20, 2004
| SOTU Simulblog

I’m blogging these impressions live, so forgive any typos:

  • What you see on CSPAN but not on the major networks: Cheney welcoming all the key dignitaries by name, and asking the escorts to leave the chamber and prepare for the entrance of the CIC.
  • They now welcome the First Lady to her seat, and the acting Dean of the diplomatic corps … again, pomp and circumstance we don’t see on NBC.
  • Colin Powell enters his last SOTU as SecState …
  • Notice that Tom Ridge’s tie does NOT match our current threat level (he’s wearing burgundy)
  • THE CAMPAIGN HAS BEGUN … Bush hugs a baby during his walk down the aisle …
  • Our troops are good … our workers are good … tax cut is good … drug benefit is good …
  • The main message of the overture: Don’t turn back now. (My observation … we’re strong, leave it to the Dems to say we are weak)
  • The Patriot Act is “essential” … we need to renew … “the terrorist threat will not expire on that schedule.”
  • “The people of Iraq are free” … and the US “enforced” the demands of the UN
  • Lybia is because we backed diplomacy with force
  • And Iran should keep their promises, too
  • “The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States, and war is what they got.”
  • “For all who love peace …. the world without Saddam Hussein’s regime is a safer place.”
  • “America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country.”
  • “Expect a higher standards from our friend” in the Mid-East … (does this mean Pakistan?)
  • On the economy, same message as with Nat. Secuirty … things are strong and getting better (Observation: Leave the negative message to the Dems … let them tell you things are weak.)
  • We need to stick with No Child, and provide more support to higher ed
  • Create personal retirement accounts
  • My budget will do everything I want while limiting the growth in descretionary spending to less than 4% … we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years.
  • Health Savings Account is good … and “any attempt to limit the choice of our seniors … will meet my veto.”
  • Please pass Association Health Plans.
  • Please give Americans a refundable tax credit that they can use to buy insurance … and lets computerize health records while we’re at it.
  • A second shot at frivolous lawsuits … needless lawsuits are bad (again)
  • People who buy catastrophic coverage as part of the health savings accounts should be able to deduct 100% of the premiums from their taxes.
  • “A government run health care system is the wrong prescription.”
  • (Uhhh … did not expect to type this) Steroiods are bad, and should be banned
  • Marraige … (it sounds like he’s saying we need to protect it via the constitutional process)
  • We need to help faith-based charities … and prisoners who have been released from prison … Bush proposes a 4-year, $300 million prisoner Re-Entry Initiative
  • Read the full text to understand this: Yes Ashley, there is a US Army …

Hope this was useful … overall, it should reflect the argumentative flow of the speech. I’ve already posted the full text of the address above this entry, and thanks for reading the Post.



Posted by Alan at January 20, 2004 09:45 PM | TrackBack
Comments
Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)