The Command Post
2004 US Presidential Election
January 11, 2004
| The Talking Heads Talk Blogs On Meet The Press

During today's Meet The Press Tim Russert, David Broder of WaPo, Ron Brownstein of Los Angeles Times, Roger Simon of U.S. News, and Chuck Todd of The Hotline/National Journal considered the role of blogs in the current election.

Still some old-school thinking here. Mr. Russert, for example, sums up blogs as "a cyber-bulletin board." Sure ... kind of the way a Sunday morning interview program is "a TV news show," but OK.

There's also this priceless comment:

MR. RUSSERT: Roger Simon, when I say troll, I think of you.
We also see Mr. Simon be a bit pretentious:
MR. SIMON: I am a blogger sort of. I mean, the difference between—look, a true blog is I woke up this morning, I decided to skip chem class, now I want to write about the last episode of "Friends." That's what blogs are. You know, it’s people talking to each other. My site is actually written columns. There’s a difference between writing and typing basically. Well, I mean, the theory between blogging is half correct. It’s everybody has an opinion and then the other half is: And everyone else wants to read about it. That’s not necessarily true. When I first put up the site, it got all these responses. I thought people wanted me to respond to them. They don't. They want to talk to each other. And that has been the power that Dean has tapped into.
I'm glad to hear that Command Post is, in fact, NOT a blog ... we've not yet considered Friends. So, in the interest of legitimacy, I think Ross is a pushover and that they jumped the shark six years ago. Visit Simon's blog, RogerSimon.com, here. Broder, though, seems closer to the point:
MR. BRODER: No, but I think it's a tremendous tool, and it's part of what is the healthiest trend in our politics, which is going back to personal communication, away from the mass media—forgive me, NBC. But I think the healthiest thing that’s going on now is people talking to people, either through the Internet or, as we're seeing on the ground in Iowa, face-to-face communication.
As our man GR would say, "Indeed."

You can read the entire transcript here. For those looking for Electoral Bonus Content, there's a much less interesting interview with Kerry up front.

Update: As Michele notes in the comments, the Roger Simon above is not our Roger Simon.

>MR. RUSSERT: Roger Simon, when I say troll, I think of you.< Well, Tim, that makes two of us.



Posted by Alan at January 11, 2004 02:21 PM | TrackBack
Comments

For those familiar with blogs, keep in mind that the Roger Simon above is not THE Roger Simon, author and blogger.

Also, Jeff Jarvismore on the show today.

Posted by: michele at January 11, 2004 04:39 PM

Must be something about the name Roger Simon that made parents give it to two such losers.

Posted by: anon at January 11, 2004 07:29 PM

Must be something about losers that make them post anonymous comments.

Posted by: michele at January 11, 2004 08:26 PM

joe smith

Posted by: joe smith at January 12, 2004 12:19 AM

Who in the ” ____ ” is Roger Simon?
O-o-o-p-s! Never mind! (Who cares)?

Ha! I chuckle over some of the stuff
that is written here! (I also ignore a
lot). Do you?

Posted by: leaddog2 at January 12, 2004 07:35 PM

Do you think that ‘ol Timmy will ever relate his falling ratings to the Blogasphere? I personally don’t think he is bright enough to figure it out.

Posted by: Ableiter at January 12, 2004 08:25 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)