![]() |
|
2004 US Presidential Election
July 28, 2003
Lieberman Criticizes Bush not Iraq
On the "Today" show ... eh, today ... Lieberman maintained firm in his support for the Iraq War, but stepped up his criticism of the Bush administration's handling. Offering up a pretty good sound byte, the senator observed that Bush's intelligence failures risks giving "a bad name to what really was a just war." (Full Story at the Primary Monitor) Posted by Mike Van Winkle at July 28, 2003 11:25 AM | TrackBack Comments
I’m really looking forward to the primaries where most of these monkeys will start dropping out. Posted by: johnnymozart at July 28, 2003 11:49 AM I for one hope the monkeys stay. Better monkeys running for president than ostriches. If Lieberman didn’t bad mouth Bush I’d be worried about the continued existance of the democrats as a major political party. At least he hasn’t had his head stuck in the sand for the past year like most of his adversaries in the democratic primary. Posted by: Anon at July 28, 2003 03:34 PM Anon said, “At least he hasn’t had his head stuck in the sand for the past year like most of his adversaries in the democratic primary.” Uhhhh…..I don’t think the ‘sand’ is where they’ve got their heads stuck. Posted by: Jeff B at July 28, 2003 04:35 PM Gee. How can anyone seriously question the judgement of a man who promotes Kweise Infume as a candidate for the Supreme Court? That voice! A sublime blend of a man whose bran muffin hasn’t clicked in, liberal whine, and the ambivilance of the endrogenous “Pat” character created by Julia Sweeny on SNL…. He’s toast! Posted by: Mobties at July 29, 2003 09:33 AM Although, I have to give Liberman credit. He reserved his worst criticism for others in the Democratic party. He referred to his concern about his party’s “inability to recognize a just war when they see one” Posted by: johnnymozart at July 29, 2003 09:40 AM In ref. to ‘Pat’ Lieberman: He/she could have done a much better job……..he/she is just not going to tell us how…….even with 20/20 hindsight. He would have ‘Lieberated’ those Iraqis, alright. Posted by: Jeff B at July 29, 2003 09:43 AM How LIEberal is LIEberman anyway? Does he support segreGAYted PUBLIC education for Gay Jewish kids? Posted by: Cap'n SPIN at July 30, 2003 01:08 PM somebodies always got to get gay on us. for a dem this guy isnt half bad. It’s not healthy to be so far right or so far left all the time. Posted by: gijoe at August 2, 2003 12:01 PM He was a member of my former boss’ clique(the Honorable WJ Clinton, indeed), like that Carville puke, as good a reason as any not to give him a second thought. Posted by: wolf at August 3, 2003 05:44 PM gijoe - MOST politicians (note, there are exceptions), get where they are at a price. ALL have an ‘agenda’. The Democratic ‘agenda’ and ‘platform’ require much more ‘compromise’ in order to get all of the ‘interest groups’ on the same page. I’m sorry that the bulk of the ‘specials’ have the ear of the Democratic Party, and that although there are exceptions (i.e. Log Cabin Gang), the ‘Gay Rights’ folks are primarily Democrats. Our current President has spoken on the ‘SameSexMarriage agenda’, which with the exception of the group mentioned above, is Democratic. Sorry. I just call ‘em as I sees ‘em. Posted by: Cap'n SPIN at August 6, 2003 05:38 PM Post a comment
Thanks for signing in,
.
Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) |