The Command Post
2004 US Presidential Election
July 14, 2003
Nader Says He'll Decide On '04 Run By End Of Year

From the Baltimore Sun:

Dismissing criticism that his Green Party candidacy helped elect President Bush in 2000, Ralph Nader said yesterday that he is weighing a bid for the White House next year.

The veteran consumer activist, whose third-party presidential campaign drew 2.8 million votes in the last election, criticized Democrats for not aggressively challenging the Bush administration's economic policies and its handling of corporate fraud. The party's candidates, he said, have not shown that they are a sound alternative to Bush ...

... Speaking to reporters at a breakfast meeting, Nader said he would decide by year's end whether to launch another presidential campaign. If he does, Nader said he would run as an independent or as a Green Party candidate.



Posted by Alan at July 14, 2003 08:45 PM | TrackBack
Comments

I wish Nader would run with Cynthia McKinney as his running mate.

Posted by: Watcher at July 14, 2003 09:53 PM

Watcher

Being a resident of San Francisco, I can tell you that Cynthia McKinney’s statements sound like verbatim echoes of what you would hear from any one of the air headed robotic liberals in this burg given the same circumstances.
Collectively, they bring to mind those cyborg types in the “I, Mudd” episode of the original Star Trek series.

Posted by: Seth at July 14, 2003 10:12 PM

I’m 23 years old and still waiting for an original idea to come from the mouths of Liberal thinkers. In our society today Liberals are spending far too much time attacking BUSH and absolutely no time in developing alternatives.

Posted by: Jeff MacMillan at July 16, 2003 01:39 PM

The truth is people respond to attack ads. Why are reality shows all over tv? Because people watch them. Why do attack ads work? Beacuse people watch and remember them. Both crap, both trash. However, consumers demand them. Lets face it, most people are not interested in politics. They form their opinion by listening to a 30 second commercial. Whoever seems weak they dont vote for. Especially now in this day in age. Obviously us on this board enjoy politics. We investigate and we form our own opinions.

Posted by: John at July 16, 2003 03:56 PM

Buy
Lipitor Buy
Zocor
Buy Plavix
Buy Advair Buy
Prevacid
Buy Casodex
Buy Pravachol Buy
Norvasc
Buy Celebrex
Buy Effexor
Buy Vioxx Buy
Diovan
Buy Zoloft
Buy Actonel Buy
Paxil
Buy Celexa
Buy Claritin Buy
Actos
Buy Singulair
Buy Nexium

Buy
Nolvadex
Buy Levoxyl/Synthroid
Buy Mevacor Buy
Biaxin
Buy Inderal
Buy Xeloda Buy
Crestor
Buy Tenormin/Atenolol
Buy Procardia Buy
Depakote

Buy Toprol Buy
Sinemet
Buy Monopril
Buy Glucophage/Metformin
Buy Lotensin Buy
Prozac
Buy Topamax
Buy Clarinex Buy
Zyprexa
Buy Coreg


Buy Tamoxifen Buy
Lupron
Buy Calan
Buy Femara Buy
Soriatane
Buy Prinivil
Buy Avalide Buy
Tiazac
Buy Cozaar
Buy Ditropan
Buy Hyzaar Buy
Arimidex
Buy Wellbutrin
Buy Avandia Buy
Prilosec
Buy Premarin
Buy Detrol Buy
Proscar
Buy Agrylin
Buy Altace

Buy Fosamax Buy
Tricor
Buy Protonix
Buy Neurontin Buy
Lamisil
Buy Flomax
Buy
Aciphex
Buy Aricept
Buy Evista Buy
Bextra

canadian pharmacies
canadian drugs
canada drugs
canada pharmacies
canada pharmacy

advair

lipitor

Posted by: canadian pharmacy at December 17, 2003 09:48 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)