The Command Post
2004 US Presidential Election
July 13, 2003
Missing Democrat Candidates an "Affront to NAACP"

[Miami Herald]

The NAACP's top leadership lashed out Saturday at several of the major Democratic candidates for president, calling their intention to skip Monday's candidate forum an ''affront'' to the nation's oldest civil rights organization.

As many as four of the nine candidates have refused to participate in the forum, expressing reluctance to appear on stage with their rivals in a debate format, NAACP officials said.

Full story...



Posted by Michele at July 13, 2003 10:43 PM | TrackBack
Comments

“If you’re afraid to appear against Al Sharpton, maybe you should be running for another office.”
LMAO!!
I’m sorry, but-LOL- and people here in SF can’t understand why I wouldn’t want to be a democrat!
LOL!
Third grade in the loony bin! LMAO!!
This is the sort of stuff that goes on at functions on that side of the aisle.
“If you’re afraid to appear against Al Sharpton…!!” LOL, excuse me, I have to sit here and laugh good and hard for a bit…
Ho Ho Ho, that’s rich!!

Posted by: Seth at July 13, 2003 11:57 PM

I’m not surprised.

For some years I have been puzzled by the ethnic Black Americans supporting the Democrat party when the Democrats only pay lip service to equality or being “color blind”. The NAACP would never endorse George Bush and yet he has placed more Americans of African heritage to positions of responsibility than any Democrat ever did.
The same is true with the Women’s Liberation Movement.

Oh WELL…………:)))

Posted by: Belle at July 14, 2003 04:01 AM

Like I’ve said on another thread;

The democrats thrive on an imaginary championing of the downtrodden, yet those downtrodden never seem to get out of their underdog status; The dems keep them complacent and preach to the media about their “plight”, but they don’t quite do enough to further their lot- you’re right, Belle, more minority members get ahead under Republicans than under democrats.
That’s because the democrats need to keep the downtrodden where they are, to use as one of their campaign platforms.
Pitiful and sick, but there it is.

Posted by: Seth at July 14, 2003 04:13 AM

And not even inviting a Republican to speak, that’s not an “affront” to every black in America, to hear all who might help and support them?

No, just another chapter in the victem / shakedown manual.

Posted by: irabk at July 14, 2003 09:08 AM

It’s okay for the NAACP to snub white republicans, but it’s not alright for white dems to snub the NAACP. Only in their PC free-for-all logic does any of this make sense.

My personal favorite: you can’t possibly be a racist if you’re not in “power”, which posits that’s impossible for those in minority positions to be guilty of race hatred. Right. Last time I looked, the Aryan Brotherhood wasn’t in power and boy, can those guys hate.

Woody Allen was right, you can years without sex, but you can’t go a day without rationalization. Especially if you’re the NAACP.

Posted by: torpedo_eight at July 14, 2003 01:28 PM

Buy
Lipitor Buy
Zocor
Buy Plavix
Buy Advair Buy
Prevacid
Buy Casodex
Buy Pravachol Buy
Norvasc
Buy Celebrex
Buy Effexor
Buy Vioxx Buy
Diovan
Buy Zoloft
Buy Actonel Buy
Paxil
Buy Celexa
Buy Claritin Buy
Actos
Buy Singulair
Buy Nexium

Buy
Nolvadex
Buy Levoxyl/Synthroid
Buy Mevacor Buy
Biaxin
Buy Inderal
Buy Xeloda Buy
Crestor
Buy Tenormin/Atenolol
Buy Procardia Buy
Depakote

Buy Toprol Buy
Sinemet
Buy Monopril
Buy Glucophage/Metformin
Buy Lotensin Buy
Prozac
Buy Topamax
Buy Clarinex Buy
Zyprexa
Buy Coreg


Buy Tamoxifen Buy
Lupron
Buy Calan
Buy Femara Buy
Soriatane
Buy Prinivil
Buy Avalide Buy
Tiazac
Buy Cozaar
Buy Ditropan
Buy Hyzaar Buy
Arimidex
Buy Wellbutrin
Buy Avandia Buy
Prilosec
Buy Premarin
Buy Detrol Buy
Proscar
Buy Agrylin
Buy Altace

Buy Fosamax Buy
Tricor
Buy Protonix
Buy Neurontin Buy
Lamisil
Buy Flomax
Buy
Aciphex
Buy Aricept
Buy Evista Buy
Bextra

canadian pharmacies
canadian drugs
canada drugs
canada pharmacies
canada pharmacy

advair

lipitor

Posted by: canadian pharmacy at December 17, 2003 09:47 AM

Okay, I just told you what Apple wants you to look out for with window positions, but in the real world, not everyone uses the hiding feature of the Dock, and it is unrealistic to be able to predict where each user will place their Dock at any given day or how large they will have it. However, you can build a feature into your application that allows spacing for the Finder. You can give users the option of where to position their windows and what area of the screen not to cross. I know that BBEdit provides me with this feature, and I wish more developers gave me more control over my windows.

Posted by: Archilai at January 24, 2004 06:38 AM

At WWDC, I listened to Apple representatives make some excellent points about taking the time to build a 100%-compliant Aqua application, and I think all developers need to look beyond the code and listen to what the folks at Apple have to say

Posted by: Sampson at January 24, 2004 06:42 AM

This topic is one we will tackle later in this article, but it refers to making sure that your application and the dock aren’t fighting it out for supremacy of the screen.

Posted by: Polidore at January 24, 2004 06:44 AM

I love this site! It has everything!

Posted by: Online gambling at March 27, 2004 05:56 AM

Great Site - Come to visit!

Posted by: texas hold em at April 1, 2004 05:04 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)